AN OVERVIEW OF THE SITUATION
In partition 1: Blocked Arteries!, we had discovered that the highest corporate goals were producing radically unequal - and conflicting - activities among the staff in distant departments. In that discourse we will review the next steps that resulted in the removal of the blockage, and how it set the stage for greatly increased throughput in the Inpatient Process, and subsequently in the stagnant Emergency Process.
HOW THROUGHPUT IS MEASURED
Before picking up on the activities followed by the throughput team to relieve process blockages and improve Emergency through-put, it would probably be a first-class judgment to identify key measures for advance.
In a hospital, as in any organization, it's paramount to be able to monitor process flow. Manufacturing habitually focuses on the production of the manufactured goods. A mortgage gathering will monitor the speed with which the mortgage is put well-adjusted and delivered. ! A hospital, in the duplicate way, must monitor how quickly and how well the patient is diagnosed, treated, and moved through the hospital rule. The "how well" or quality measure for the hospital inpatient is indicated in the outcomes of the care, normally by monitoring returns for care, either in re-admissions, returns to surgery, or similar indicators. The "how quickly" measure is demonstrated through length of stay, how enduring the patient is in the hospital for a addicted diagnosis. It's extensive to understand that the goal here is an optimum length of stay: the shortest stay viable while still maintaining excellent clinical outcomes. Hospitals have to balance the two to be macrocosm class.
THE CONSTRAINT TO THROUGHPUT: THE INPATIENT PROCESS
Dr. Goldratt had postulated in his Theory of Constraints that at times so often organization has a constraining process, one that holds all other processes back from producing at a higher output. Since highest of the ho! spital conflict diagrams pointed to conflicts with Inpatient, ! the deci sion was made to sweat the team efforts there.
WHAT WOULD THE PAYOFF BE?
Understandably, executive staff was concerned that the process be worth the expenditures in go and money, so a pro-forma was compassed by the consulting firm that analyzed bed-days. A bed-day was defined as "a patient in a bed for one day", and since reimbursement is a fixed amount for a habituated diagnosis, shortening the length of stay would allow more frequent use of the bed - or more bed-days. If the bed can be used more frequently, which occurs if the patient's stay is shorter, take would raise through of the increased volume. The caveat was that clinical outcomes could not be compromised, the patient had to come out trustworthy as well, or better, than before the shortened length of stay.
The pro-forma showed that the hospital had the latent, by shortening length of stay through speeding up the Inpatient Process, of generating about $12,000,000 in new velvet! that could be accom! plished by reducing length of stay by one day, or 24 hours. The question was, could the length of stay be shortened that lots by cleaning up the Inpatient Process?
GETTING TO THE ROOT OF facets
So, assuming that throughput in the Inpatient Process was critical to throughput in Emergency, the team got down to career systematically identifying "pinch points" within the Inpatient Process. The interviews with staff and physicians had provided lots input on common issues, and the further donkeywork by the PI range narrowed those down to about 20, of which 12 were really actionable by the team.
The sweat of the team at that mote was to speed up operation of inpatient care, and to do that the root causes of the 12 targeted pinch points had to be identified. It was here where some of the biggest surprises came. Prior to that the team (all of whom were well-trained in process and problem solving tools) had a wrap root cause analysis, but not to the depth the TOC to! ols compulsory. throughout the ensuing probing disruption of i! ssues, i t was create that prevalent of the deep root causes were "linked", or had two causes that had to become of at the similarly instance, for the problem to occur. As these causes were isolated, team representatives brainstormed solutions which were anon tested in a limited fashion for effective-ness.
AN model OF EFFECTIVE FINDINGS
To give an ideal of one key finding of the team, we'll bring out on the lab's interaction with the patient care units.
In classification for a physician to fashion disposition of the patient in a timely manner, he/she must have spanking lab whole novel, preferably at the generation rounds are made so the discharge process can be begun. The team get going that blood draws, although frequently succeeded as early as 2:00 AM, ofttimes did not appear in the lab in tempo for the report to be ready for the physician. Further probe showed that in that laboratory was budgeted to a limited representation of phlebotomists, lab staff frequently ! batched the 40-50 draws that were common on first shift. That batching resulted in tardy draws, and it was regular for life-critical draws to be missed, sometimes necessitating a wait of 30 hours before the draw could be ended anew. Did THAT contribute to increased length of stay? Guess so!
LENGTH OF STAY originates DOWN
that lab issue was only one of more than a dozen findings of the team. brought about a four month period improvements were put into allot, and halfway April and June of that year length of stay dropped from a sky-scraping of 5.23 days to 4.34 days - almost a full day. Not too shabby!
As the picture unfolded, it was discovered that the practice of budgeting by exercise, or force, was a key contributor to inefficiencies in the Inpatient Process. As supporting departments, such as Laboratory, Radiology, EKG, etc. "reigned in" their budgets to meet corporate fiscal requirements, the effect was to delay delivery of the services Nursing relied o! n to move the patient through in a timely manner. Final coroll! ary: Inp atient throughput was constrained
Emergency Room Throughput Diagnosis detail 3: Complications!, will document the final outcomes of that interesting initiative.
The scripter of that treatise, Tim Connor, is president and founder of Rodeo! Performance Group, Inc., an Ocala-based group of facilitators busy with both runty and exorbitant organizations, helping them identify modes for moving performance to terrene-class levels. Rodeo staff have delivered results in developing strategies, improving poor leadership habits and skills, reducing organizational conflict, improving flagging customer satisfaction, and developing measurement systems to drive effective struggle. Tim can be contacted at timconnor@rodeopg.com or by phone at (352) 629-0020. explore the Rodeo! website at http://www.rodeopg.com
medicine
